Current Events

You are currently browsing the archive for the Current Events category.

The recent news that Amazon had deleted digital copies of Orwell’s 1984 and Animal Farm from Kindles got me thinking today. It really goes to show that when a company like Amazon put so much into a device (which is really a pretty cool device) and think they can get away with redefining the landscape of reading, writing, publishing and ultimately, all the forms of business surrounding these activities, that they will ultimately meet Orwell. Bezos made such a ruckus about the Kindle being so much more than just a gadget. The Whispernet delivery and the access to Amazon make it a service as much as a gizmo, Bezos argued.

So, when purchased content suddenly becomes “unavailable” what we have is a Digital Age / DRM case of “Out-of-Print”. Which is kind of funny that Amazon would, for all their effort to make print digital, find that they too are subject to the rule of copyrights, and instead of people being angry at the Orwell folks, we’re all pissed at Amazon.

So, I’m just going to suggest that those Kindle owners who are feeling angry about this, remember that no matter what Jeff Bezos says in the sales pitch, you bought a gadget. Now, put it away and go to indiebound, locate a nice independent bookstore in your area or online and buy yourself a nice paperback. I assure you it will make you feel better.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags: , ,

Just a quick update: Last week, when I wrote “I really loved your book! Would you sign my Kindle?”, I knew it was only a matter of time before it happened. Well, thank you David Sedaris, you have pioneered the ridiculous once again. Here’s a link to the New york Times article Kindle Joins a Literary Ritual: Authors Can Autograph It.

That’s all, for now.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags: , ,

While I was reading up on the news from this year’s BookExpo America, I was struck by the comments Sherman Alexie made about Amazon’s Kindle.

As I’ve written at some length about the Kindle, I thought I’d continue my exploration into the eBook controversy and consider some of these criticisms.

At one of the panels, Sherman Alexie was asked about the Kindle and he stated that he thought they were elitist, priced far beyond the means of poor kids, and went further to state that he saw a woman on his plane while flying to New York who was reading a Kindle, and he wanted to hit her.

I really hate this kind of stuff. It reminds me of a time in the 1980’s when I went to see Hunter S. Thompson speak at the Chautauqua Auditorium in Boulder, Colorado. I had, in my teens, been quite a fan of Thompson and his insanity, so I was very excited to go and see him speak. I tell you that I lost all respect and interest in the man there and then. He showed up over an hour late, ranted and raved incoherently for a few minutes, then took some questions which resulted in him throwing a glass and taking some verbal shots at a “lesbian” in the audience and leaving. It was, in a word, disappointing.

For some reason, I get a similar feeling when I read Sherman Alexie say stupid things about people reading Kindles. Not only does it miss the point entirely, it causes us to question him more than the point he was making, namely, technology.

As a technologist, I firmly believe that technology has to be tested. Part of the test is of course done by the people who develop the technology, but the real test comes later, after a market for the technology has been established. Alexie makes a very good point about the difficulty poor kids face in a world of expensive electronic reading devices. I’ve been researching the role of Libraries in the so-called “conversion to digital“ books, and it is very clear that if devices replace printed books, the role of libraries will change dramatically, and possibly in many less-then-favorable ways. I for one have no interest in seeing libraries unable to provide a full range of titles because they are in some way limited by restrictive Intellectual Property laws from distributing digital copies. I also believe strongly that writers must have the ability to benefit financially from their work. These positions are not at all balanced in the current structure of copyright law primarily because digital books, like MP3 files are uncontrollable in the same way that printed books and CD’s are controllable. Similarly, I see no value in any process which seeks to divide rich from poor, especially when it comes to access to books. One of the greatest achievements in modern society is the concept of the public library. I visit my own local library on a near daily basis, and I believe they are one of the most valuable and vital institutions mankind has devised. It is also arguable though, that the library of the future will take a more important role in distributing materials evenly and expanding the access of the general public, rich and poor, to books as well as to computers and technologies.

Do eBooks challenge the Library? Perhaps.

Mr. Alexie: Do Kindles make poor kids less likely to get at good books? Do they really add such a weight to the current social imbalance? Do you seriously think that expressing anger towards people who own them is a productive way to counter the technology?

One of the primary reasons why I took an interest in the Kindle stemmed from my work with blind/visually impaired students. I strongly believe that eBooks are key to making content more accessible. The answer is in the formats and the availability of texts in the mainstream (meaning that a blind person need not have a separate means for getting a book than a sighted person). Now, whether reading for school or pleasure, a blind student needs to add 5-6 weeks of advance time to get books. Many of these books have to be manually scanned, and then are delivered to the reader in some far from suitable proprietary digital format. Consider if a student could simply buy the book in a digital format and have a device which performed text-to-speech or was readable on a refreshable braille display? For these people, the ability to rely on the same mainstream formats as the rest of the world is huge.

I wish I could present Mr. Alexie with a similarly compelling argument in regards to socioeconomic inequalities. I cannot. A middle class person (when there was such a creature) who digests 25-50 titles a year would find that owning a Kindle was in fact economically beneficial. Consider that most hardcover, front-list titles retail for $24.99 or more and retail on the Kindle for $9.99, this presents a $15 dollar savings to the consumer. Save that on 25 titles and you’ve just reduced the cost of your investment by $375. As the 6-inch Kindle sells for $359, it’s a pretty economically sound purchase. (A new company from the UK called Interead has just gotten into the market with a device called Cool-er which is around $250 and more are sure to follow.)

Funny how two writers whose work I have been amazed by, Sherman Alexie and Mark Helprin would sacrifice themselves so on the altar of negative press. These are two of America’s finest living writers, and their opinions should matter. Alexie posted a response on his website which reads: ”Even as I’m being insulted by hundreds of strangers, I am grateful that the Internet literary world is a bit abuzz with discussions about the negative and positive aspects of eBooks.“ Again, I state that I support Alexie and will continue to do so regardless of the bad press surrounding this incident. He is a writer who brings insight and important questions to our world from a valuable perspective and a valuable place. I’m not quite so willing to say nice things about Mark Helprin because I happen to think his ideas go too far, but I will state that he is a remarkable writer, and his insights too matter very much.

My conclusion: eBook readers are in my opinion not the ultimate answer. Many of my reasons for saying this mirror Mr. Alexie’s criticisms. They cost too much. One interest is in control: Amazon. And I’d add: The device is limited by its exclusive link to Amazon content. It is far too much an interface to Amazon’s service. The real shift is going to come when Intellectual Property Laws (US and International) have matured to deal with digital content, and the devices are built commercially agnostic. No one business interest can represent the reading public, and any device which limits us that much is doomed to fail. And printed books, while they may become more expensive, will never disappear. They are too cherished, too much a part of us to be cast aside completely.

In the meantime, I continue to research and get opinions about the impact of digital content on libraries, and hope to post something worthy in the coming weeks. Comments are most welcome here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags: , , , ,

OK. I’m a self-professed digital enthusiast. I’m a technology teacher and consultant. You’d think I would place myself firmly in the camp of digital over analog. MP3 over vinyl. Photoshop over the darkroom. Kindle over books.

Preposterous.

And yet… in a practical sense, I do listen to digital music, not records (in fact, I haven’t owned a turntable for years, and my old records have been gathering copious amounts of dust). I use a digital camera almost exclusively now. And I own a Kindle.

Back in the mid-1990’s I was happily working at one of the larger independent bookstores in the country and reading voraciously. There were no digital book readers. The half-millennial continuum of writing and printing remained intact. We in the book trade (even those of us with a strong interest in technology) were happily oblivious to the coming shift in the industry that would come from online retail and digital readers.

Now, that continuum is showing signs of stress. It is not broken, but it is suddenly becoming clear that the path has taken a new direction. Publishing is not the same. Book-selling is not the same. Books themselves are not the same.

What is a book?

If you had asked me this question in 1995 I would have had no trouble answering the question with confidence. A book is a physical object which serves as a container for written or graphical works. It is a collection of pages (arranged in signatures), bound along one edge between two protective covers. As physical objects, not all books are equal. Some are hard bound with nice thick pages. Others are cheap paperbacks with a very uniform, standardized feel. There are as many varieties of book in a physical sense as there are written books in a textual sense.

While I was working at the Tattered Cover Bookstore in Denver, I got great pleasure from attending book signings. Nothing thrilled me more than spending $25 (a considerable sum from my meager bookstore earnings) on a brand new hardcover and standing in line to have the author sign the book for me. In fact, as I worked there, I often got to meet some of these writers in the employee break-room or smoking area. And so I have a nice collection of signed firsts from such luminous characters as William Gibson, Kurt Vonnegut and Peter Matthiessen.

In these days of Amazon Kindles and Sony Readers, I’ve been trying very hard to keep up with the flood of thought on publishing, but lets face it, the Internet is far too vast to allow anyone to “keep up”. Some interesting posts include:

Follow the Reader: The Outer Limits of Publishing
A Newbie’s Guide to Book Publishing: More on the Amazon Kindle (author JA Konrath’s fascinating discussion of the economics of self-publishing on Kindle)
Kindle Notes And Highlights Now Accessible On the Web
Michael Hart, the inventor of eBooks, says the Kindle won’t go
Screenwriter of Complex Ideas Experiments With Kindle
and this favorite Got a Kindle, but miss that booky smell? This spray is for you

(These are just a couple of the more interesting posts I’ve stumbled upon in the last couple days)

Suddenly is seems that technology has propelled us forward into a highly convenient but awkward period in the history of books. Considering all the buzz surrounding these devices as technical accomplishments, and our relative inability to make any sense out of the legal foundations for the publishing industry, we should reasonably expect a very chaotic and fun period ahead. Already we have factions forming: The EFF, Creative Commons, Larry Lessig, Cory Doctorow, and others against a faction of reactionaries and nostalgics exemplified by Mark Helprin (see his May 2007 NYT Op-Ed), businesses (publishers, mostly, who cannot rightfully be called reactionary or nostalgic because they represent the commercial traditions of publishing as it has progressed for 500 years.) I don’t want to go over the ancient battles between RIAA and Napster, but all this is now part of the on-going discussion about publishing, Intellectual Property rights, and, ultimately, the ability for creative people to make a living off the IP they create as well as the ability for that creative work to sustain the consuming public and the publishing & retail industries which funnel these items into us.

Honestly, I’m not much of an oracle, but I do feel that the business model is faced with a vast army of tech-wise adversaries who have more and more tools at their disposal for rendering content, and that there is no way for the publishers to win. It just isn’t possible. They’d have to spend too much money fighting against a waterfall of free technologies designed to undo DRM and copy-protection. At least, this has been my way of seeing things for the last decade.

But now I’m coming to a new way of seeing things. Not only is it technically and financially unreasonable for the established business model (the publishers, and their advocacy groups like RIAA and MPAA) to control the digital content as they wish, it is suddenly becoming possible for creative producers and artists do more without publishers. It’s small, and it does rely on a delivery platform like Amazon.com (and believe me, they are a big business when it comes to working with little individuals) but still, they are there and a person can easily offer a title for publication there and expect to generate some income. The better and smarter the writer, the more they can generate.

But here’s the rub: Amazon. I can’t say I want to see all the established publishing houses go the way of the Dodo to see Amazon.com become the new face of publishing. As altruistic as JA Konrath’s blog on self-publishing sounds to us little people, to Jeff Bezos and Amazon, it sounds like a resounding advertisement for their business model. Sony have a far less capable device in my opinion, but their content model (especially the connection to Google Books) is advantageous.

What do we do now? Bezos declared “This isn’t a device, it’s a service.” when he was hyping the first Kindle. The device (that sleek white thing you paid $400 for) is basically nothing more than a very cool Welcome mat that beckons you into the cool stream of Amazon-only content. (I know, this is not entirely fair, because there are ways to have Amazon convert content to Kindle format for you at no cost.) But try self-publishing your novel for Kindle and not making it available via Amazon. Hmmm. Now I need an eCommerce system, a way to convert my novel from text to .azw Kindle format, and a way to make such a book relevant to a market where it doesn’t exist (no downloads via Whispernet, no “Folks who bought this also bought”, no Amazon at all. In the world of online marketing, Amazon are in the Pantheon, and it is not because of the things they say about themselves and the products they sell, it’s all a part of the mechanics of how they sell.

So here’s how I get the most out of my Kindle. First, I don’t use it all the time. Rather than purchasing some aerosol canister of book scent to spray and give me that whiff of physical authenticity, I still get books from my local library (I get lots, in fact). I have several interesting newer titles that I’ve purchased from Amazon which are always available and loaded on my Kindle. These I also access from the Kindle App in my iPhone (because nothing kills me more than having to wait an hour at a Doctor or Dentist office or waiting while I get my car serviced and not having anything interesting to read. I can tap right into my Kindle books from the device or my iPhone. I really like that.

Then, I load my Kindle up with tons of stuff from Project Gutenberg. I like to read to my kids, and so I have tons of classic Children’s books loaded on the device. Andersen’s Fairy Tales, Grimm’s, Lewis Carroll, Edith Nesbitt (who is a real find), L. Frank Baum and J.M. Barrie. I have loads of books — everything from Thucydides to Poul Anderson. In all honesty, nothing says “Happy Geek” like reading Frederich Schiller’s (complete) History of the Thirty Years War as a free eText on your eBook reader. In fact, all these titles are available from Gutenberg as mobi formatted downloads (mobi is a DRM free format that is a precursor to Amazon’s .azw format and fully supported on the Kindle. The only mild inconvenience is that I have to download the content to my computer and then plug the Kindle in via USB to copy the new content. But, with a nice SD card, the Kindle can accomadate a ton of books, and I load a GB of free mobi books on mine just to ensure I never run out of good reading. I still have ample room for Amazon purchases.

I have no regrets about buying a Kindle: I am still a proud card-carrying Library patron, and I’m pleased to now say that I think Project Gutenberg is not just a good idea (which it has always been), but a great place to get reading material. I hate reading off computer screens any more than I have to, and the Kindle is a great electronic approximation of the printed page.

Now all we need to figure out is how we can get authors to autograph our electronic books.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags: , , , ,

This morning I was appalled to read the story in the Colorado Springs Gazette about Colorado House Rep. Douglas Bruce. If Colorado had any political dignity, it would remove Rep. Bruce from public office and put him in a cage. No publicly elected official should be allowed to keep their job after referring to our State’s migrant workers as “illiterate peasants”. Period.

Below is an email I sent to Rep. Bruce this morning:

Dear Mr. Bruce:

Not only do you fail as a representative, you fail as a citizen. We can only hope that your days in government in this state will soon be over.

Leland Buck
Colorado Springs, CO

Mr. Bruce’s e-mail is taxcutter@email.msn.com. Just because Mr. Bruce prides himself as an über-Republican tax-cutter, doesn’t mean he’s beyond the reach of the voters and taxpayers. I beseech the public, from all corners of the globe to let this enormous, obtuse ass know how distasteful his views are and how unacceptable and unsavory his conduct is. Again, friends, please, write to the man, editorialize in the press and in blogs, pray the man steps in front of a bus… do something. Do not let stupidity like this inhabit our government.

While I have made every effort not to be political in my blogging, I have decided that all platforms are necessary to express disapproval and combat the threat that this man’s imbecility presents to the State of Colorado.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Once again, we are seeing the all-too-familiar images of a school shooting. I’m not going to go off on one of my lengthy, vitriolic anti-gun rants, though it seems the obvious thing to do. I’d rather just say that I find this type of situation to be completely unnecessary, and alarmingly frequent. I’ll be careful not to express any form of approval for suicide bombing, but I see striking similarities between American style shooting rampages and suicide bombing as employed by radical groups around the world. The one strikingly obvious difference is the complete absence of ideology or theology in the case of American shootings.  What drives these people to take such extreme steps? Clearly, there is an illness in America which desperately requires diagnosis and treatment.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Another shooting, this one in my own backyard. I took the opportunity on Monday to let some of my students discuss the shooting in class. I was surprised by how diverse the views were. Some were openly in support of the volunteer guard and her ability to carry a firearm into church and her willingness to use it, others were of the view that there are simply too many guns.

Regardless, this is another senseless situation which should have us all asking ourselves important questions.

I’m O.K. with the right to bear arms, it is the reality of armed people I have trouble with.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis