Books

You are currently browsing the archive for the Books category.

Life by Keith Richards

LifeHere’s a little review of a big book (possible spoiler alert in effect):

Life by Keith Richards
Hardcover, First Edition, 564 pages
Published October 26th 2010 by Little, Brown and Company
ISBN: 031603438X ISBN-13:9780316034388

I first saw the Rolling Stones on their Tattoo You Tour in the early 80’s. (October 4, 1981 at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colorado to be precise). I was just a kid myself at the time, but I remember Mick Jagger dropping roses from a cherry picker onto the crowd and the sound was phenomenal. Keith describes this tour as the last before Mick’s “betrayal” and the last big American tour in their pre-megatour period. In terms of showmanship, it was mostly Mick, with minimal spectacle from Keith, Bill, Charlie or Ron. I’ve seen them since, and I have somewhat similar recollections of later performances even if the overall stage show has become much more of a production. Mick was clearly the circus-master and the part of the act you really watched. But that in no way means that the Stones are just Mick Jagger’s back-up band. Anyone who has seen them play knows that what you hear is a sound defined by Keith’s guitar and Charlie Watts’ drums. Ron Wood is a really talented guitarist who adds a great deal and the bassist (Bill Wyman into the 90’s and Darryl Jones more recently) do their part. As Keith frequently reminds us, it’s a group effort. But lets face it, while Jagger may play a dominant role in the spectacle of their performance, Keith plays a huge part in that amazing sound and energy.

keith_richards1

After reading Keith’s book, I realize why I’ve always loved the Stones, and a great deal of it comes down to Keith’s passion for the sound. He’s a guitarist who loves the tonal character of his instrument and has figured out that its quality it can be expanded more by simplifying and restructuring the tuning and playing with heart than by adding gizmos and effects. His 5-string open-G tuning (which he talks about at length in the book) is a great example of this. So too is his love of simple 8-track “room recording” techniques that capture the energy of the performance as well as the sound quality of the instruments. He has a childlike fascination with the guitar that has led him to explore and innovate in amazing ways. He reveals how his appreciation for different musical styles has factored into his own unique style. His early fascination with American Blues as experienced by many in England in the late 50’s and early 60’s — The same Muddy Waters and Big Bill Broonzy sound that inspired Clapton and ton of other young Brits — eventually opened him to Country and Reggae and he absorbed it all into his raw, open-tuned playing style. So, let Jagger be the ballerina in the spotlight, Keith’s going to be there making sure the sound hits the mark.

Keith’s descriptions of the inner politics of the Rolling Stones are at times surprising. Keith is brutal in his portrayal of Mick and others, and he lays out some of the myths and legends once and for all. Often, it’s not pretty. Occasionally you’ll read something that makes you think Keith is a complete nutter, often a total jerk. There are sections of his story where he talks about being a father and a herion-addicted rock-star which are truly uncomfortable. In these sections it’s impossible not to think about how hard the wild life must have been for his children, especially his son Marlon. But this is all part of his honest telling, and by book’s end, it’s impossible not to wish the man well. His life has been a wild, self-destructive and incredibly creative one.

keith

His respect for Mick as a lyricist, for Charlie Watts’ abilities and Brian Jones’ shortcomings are all there to absorb in gory detail. So are some tales of drug consumption that would make Hunter S. Thompson cringe. When Keith dies, his body could be rechristened a pharmaceutical museum.

The book’s focus is clearly on his early life and the heyday years of the Stones (1964 to 1982). The last couple chapters paint the period since 1982 with fairly broad, anecdotal strokes. In this period you sense that Keith was cleaner (but not drug or alcohol free), more interested in books than syringes, and dedicated as much to his family as anything.

keith richards3In 1989 I drove across the country alone and listened to Talk is Cheap most of the way. It was a gritty sound that I couldn’t get enough of. I still listen to it frequently. I was lucky enough to see him with the X-Pensive Winos and I must say, I have never heard a live performance from any band that could top it. In the book, he talks a great deal about musical influences, inspirations and collaborations. It’s all fascinating. I was amazed at how literate he is (despite his years of hard substance abuse), and was particularly impressed with his mention of Partick O’Brien’s Aubrey/Maturin series, which appears to be a favorite of us both.

I recommend this book to any looking for an honest and engaging Rock’n'Roll memoir. Whether you love the Stones or not, Life is a fascinating read. Keith Richards is the real thing.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags:

The recent news that Amazon had deleted digital copies of Orwell’s 1984 and Animal Farm from Kindles got me thinking today. It really goes to show that when a company like Amazon put so much into a device (which is really a pretty cool device) and think they can get away with redefining the landscape of reading, writing, publishing and ultimately, all the forms of business surrounding these activities, that they will ultimately meet Orwell. Bezos made such a ruckus about the Kindle being so much more than just a gadget. The Whispernet delivery and the access to Amazon make it a service as much as a gizmo, Bezos argued.

So, when purchased content suddenly becomes “unavailable” what we have is a Digital Age / DRM case of “Out-of-Print”. Which is kind of funny that Amazon would, for all their effort to make print digital, find that they too are subject to the rule of copyrights, and instead of people being angry at the Orwell folks, we’re all pissed at Amazon.

So, I’m just going to suggest that those Kindle owners who are feeling angry about this, remember that no matter what Jeff Bezos says in the sales pitch, you bought a gadget. Now, put it away and go to indiebound, locate a nice independent bookstore in your area or online and buy yourself a nice paperback. I assure you it will make you feel better.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags: , ,

Just a quick update: Last week, when I wrote “I really loved your book! Would you sign my Kindle?”, I knew it was only a matter of time before it happened. Well, thank you David Sedaris, you have pioneered the ridiculous once again. Here’s a link to the New york Times article Kindle Joins a Literary Ritual: Authors Can Autograph It.

That’s all, for now.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags: , ,

While I was reading up on the news from this year’s BookExpo America, I was struck by the comments Sherman Alexie made about Amazon’s Kindle.

As I’ve written at some length about the Kindle, I thought I’d continue my exploration into the eBook controversy and consider some of these criticisms.

At one of the panels, Sherman Alexie was asked about the Kindle and he stated that he thought they were elitist, priced far beyond the means of poor kids, and went further to state that he saw a woman on his plane while flying to New York who was reading a Kindle, and he wanted to hit her.

I really hate this kind of stuff. It reminds me of a time in the 1980’s when I went to see Hunter S. Thompson speak at the Chautauqua Auditorium in Boulder, Colorado. I had, in my teens, been quite a fan of Thompson and his insanity, so I was very excited to go and see him speak. I tell you that I lost all respect and interest in the man there and then. He showed up over an hour late, ranted and raved incoherently for a few minutes, then took some questions which resulted in him throwing a glass and taking some verbal shots at a “lesbian” in the audience and leaving. It was, in a word, disappointing.

For some reason, I get a similar feeling when I read Sherman Alexie say stupid things about people reading Kindles. Not only does it miss the point entirely, it causes us to question him more than the point he was making, namely, technology.

As a technologist, I firmly believe that technology has to be tested. Part of the test is of course done by the people who develop the technology, but the real test comes later, after a market for the technology has been established. Alexie makes a very good point about the difficulty poor kids face in a world of expensive electronic reading devices. I’ve been researching the role of Libraries in the so-called “conversion to digital“ books, and it is very clear that if devices replace printed books, the role of libraries will change dramatically, and possibly in many less-then-favorable ways. I for one have no interest in seeing libraries unable to provide a full range of titles because they are in some way limited by restrictive Intellectual Property laws from distributing digital copies. I also believe strongly that writers must have the ability to benefit financially from their work. These positions are not at all balanced in the current structure of copyright law primarily because digital books, like MP3 files are uncontrollable in the same way that printed books and CD’s are controllable. Similarly, I see no value in any process which seeks to divide rich from poor, especially when it comes to access to books. One of the greatest achievements in modern society is the concept of the public library. I visit my own local library on a near daily basis, and I believe they are one of the most valuable and vital institutions mankind has devised. It is also arguable though, that the library of the future will take a more important role in distributing materials evenly and expanding the access of the general public, rich and poor, to books as well as to computers and technologies.

Do eBooks challenge the Library? Perhaps.

Mr. Alexie: Do Kindles make poor kids less likely to get at good books? Do they really add such a weight to the current social imbalance? Do you seriously think that expressing anger towards people who own them is a productive way to counter the technology?

One of the primary reasons why I took an interest in the Kindle stemmed from my work with blind/visually impaired students. I strongly believe that eBooks are key to making content more accessible. The answer is in the formats and the availability of texts in the mainstream (meaning that a blind person need not have a separate means for getting a book than a sighted person). Now, whether reading for school or pleasure, a blind student needs to add 5-6 weeks of advance time to get books. Many of these books have to be manually scanned, and then are delivered to the reader in some far from suitable proprietary digital format. Consider if a student could simply buy the book in a digital format and have a device which performed text-to-speech or was readable on a refreshable braille display? For these people, the ability to rely on the same mainstream formats as the rest of the world is huge.

I wish I could present Mr. Alexie with a similarly compelling argument in regards to socioeconomic inequalities. I cannot. A middle class person (when there was such a creature) who digests 25-50 titles a year would find that owning a Kindle was in fact economically beneficial. Consider that most hardcover, front-list titles retail for $24.99 or more and retail on the Kindle for $9.99, this presents a $15 dollar savings to the consumer. Save that on 25 titles and you’ve just reduced the cost of your investment by $375. As the 6-inch Kindle sells for $359, it’s a pretty economically sound purchase. (A new company from the UK called Interead has just gotten into the market with a device called Cool-er which is around $250 and more are sure to follow.)

Funny how two writers whose work I have been amazed by, Sherman Alexie and Mark Helprin would sacrifice themselves so on the altar of negative press. These are two of America’s finest living writers, and their opinions should matter. Alexie posted a response on his website which reads: ”Even as I’m being insulted by hundreds of strangers, I am grateful that the Internet literary world is a bit abuzz with discussions about the negative and positive aspects of eBooks.“ Again, I state that I support Alexie and will continue to do so regardless of the bad press surrounding this incident. He is a writer who brings insight and important questions to our world from a valuable perspective and a valuable place. I’m not quite so willing to say nice things about Mark Helprin because I happen to think his ideas go too far, but I will state that he is a remarkable writer, and his insights too matter very much.

My conclusion: eBook readers are in my opinion not the ultimate answer. Many of my reasons for saying this mirror Mr. Alexie’s criticisms. They cost too much. One interest is in control: Amazon. And I’d add: The device is limited by its exclusive link to Amazon content. It is far too much an interface to Amazon’s service. The real shift is going to come when Intellectual Property Laws (US and International) have matured to deal with digital content, and the devices are built commercially agnostic. No one business interest can represent the reading public, and any device which limits us that much is doomed to fail. And printed books, while they may become more expensive, will never disappear. They are too cherished, too much a part of us to be cast aside completely.

In the meantime, I continue to research and get opinions about the impact of digital content on libraries, and hope to post something worthy in the coming weeks. Comments are most welcome here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags: , , , ,

Summer Reading

Firewall graphicWhile I’m ranting and raving about books (electronic and not), I should put up some of the items on my summer reading list. I’m a big fan of reading lists, especially when they are shared. In fact, it’s more important in my opinion to share one’s reading list than it is to follow it — I’m one to find many interesting books in the course of a summer, so I may or may not read all these before September, and I’m sure to read a dozen things not on this list. But sharing one’s list (complete with links to author pages and other goodies) is a great way to lead others to new and amazing books. So, in that spirit, here are some books on my reading list for this summer:

Since I survive on a diet rich in murder and mayhem, we’ll start with a few of the crime fiction books:

A few non-crime fiction titles I’m looking forward to, some are re-reads:

That ought to keep me busy.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

OK. I’m a self-professed digital enthusiast. I’m a technology teacher and consultant. You’d think I would place myself firmly in the camp of digital over analog. MP3 over vinyl. Photoshop over the darkroom. Kindle over books.

Preposterous.

And yet… in a practical sense, I do listen to digital music, not records (in fact, I haven’t owned a turntable for years, and my old records have been gathering copious amounts of dust). I use a digital camera almost exclusively now. And I own a Kindle.

Back in the mid-1990’s I was happily working at one of the larger independent bookstores in the country and reading voraciously. There were no digital book readers. The half-millennial continuum of writing and printing remained intact. We in the book trade (even those of us with a strong interest in technology) were happily oblivious to the coming shift in the industry that would come from online retail and digital readers.

Now, that continuum is showing signs of stress. It is not broken, but it is suddenly becoming clear that the path has taken a new direction. Publishing is not the same. Book-selling is not the same. Books themselves are not the same.

What is a book?

If you had asked me this question in 1995 I would have had no trouble answering the question with confidence. A book is a physical object which serves as a container for written or graphical works. It is a collection of pages (arranged in signatures), bound along one edge between two protective covers. As physical objects, not all books are equal. Some are hard bound with nice thick pages. Others are cheap paperbacks with a very uniform, standardized feel. There are as many varieties of book in a physical sense as there are written books in a textual sense.

While I was working at the Tattered Cover Bookstore in Denver, I got great pleasure from attending book signings. Nothing thrilled me more than spending $25 (a considerable sum from my meager bookstore earnings) on a brand new hardcover and standing in line to have the author sign the book for me. In fact, as I worked there, I often got to meet some of these writers in the employee break-room or smoking area. And so I have a nice collection of signed firsts from such luminous characters as William Gibson, Kurt Vonnegut and Peter Matthiessen.

In these days of Amazon Kindles and Sony Readers, I’ve been trying very hard to keep up with the flood of thought on publishing, but lets face it, the Internet is far too vast to allow anyone to “keep up”. Some interesting posts include:

Follow the Reader: The Outer Limits of Publishing
A Newbie’s Guide to Book Publishing: More on the Amazon Kindle (author JA Konrath’s fascinating discussion of the economics of self-publishing on Kindle)
Kindle Notes And Highlights Now Accessible On the Web
Michael Hart, the inventor of eBooks, says the Kindle won’t go
Screenwriter of Complex Ideas Experiments With Kindle
and this favorite Got a Kindle, but miss that booky smell? This spray is for you

(These are just a couple of the more interesting posts I’ve stumbled upon in the last couple days)

Suddenly is seems that technology has propelled us forward into a highly convenient but awkward period in the history of books. Considering all the buzz surrounding these devices as technical accomplishments, and our relative inability to make any sense out of the legal foundations for the publishing industry, we should reasonably expect a very chaotic and fun period ahead. Already we have factions forming: The EFF, Creative Commons, Larry Lessig, Cory Doctorow, and others against a faction of reactionaries and nostalgics exemplified by Mark Helprin (see his May 2007 NYT Op-Ed), businesses (publishers, mostly, who cannot rightfully be called reactionary or nostalgic because they represent the commercial traditions of publishing as it has progressed for 500 years.) I don’t want to go over the ancient battles between RIAA and Napster, but all this is now part of the on-going discussion about publishing, Intellectual Property rights, and, ultimately, the ability for creative people to make a living off the IP they create as well as the ability for that creative work to sustain the consuming public and the publishing & retail industries which funnel these items into us.

Honestly, I’m not much of an oracle, but I do feel that the business model is faced with a vast army of tech-wise adversaries who have more and more tools at their disposal for rendering content, and that there is no way for the publishers to win. It just isn’t possible. They’d have to spend too much money fighting against a waterfall of free technologies designed to undo DRM and copy-protection. At least, this has been my way of seeing things for the last decade.

But now I’m coming to a new way of seeing things. Not only is it technically and financially unreasonable for the established business model (the publishers, and their advocacy groups like RIAA and MPAA) to control the digital content as they wish, it is suddenly becoming possible for creative producers and artists do more without publishers. It’s small, and it does rely on a delivery platform like Amazon.com (and believe me, they are a big business when it comes to working with little individuals) but still, they are there and a person can easily offer a title for publication there and expect to generate some income. The better and smarter the writer, the more they can generate.

But here’s the rub: Amazon. I can’t say I want to see all the established publishing houses go the way of the Dodo to see Amazon.com become the new face of publishing. As altruistic as JA Konrath’s blog on self-publishing sounds to us little people, to Jeff Bezos and Amazon, it sounds like a resounding advertisement for their business model. Sony have a far less capable device in my opinion, but their content model (especially the connection to Google Books) is advantageous.

What do we do now? Bezos declared “This isn’t a device, it’s a service.” when he was hyping the first Kindle. The device (that sleek white thing you paid $400 for) is basically nothing more than a very cool Welcome mat that beckons you into the cool stream of Amazon-only content. (I know, this is not entirely fair, because there are ways to have Amazon convert content to Kindle format for you at no cost.) But try self-publishing your novel for Kindle and not making it available via Amazon. Hmmm. Now I need an eCommerce system, a way to convert my novel from text to .azw Kindle format, and a way to make such a book relevant to a market where it doesn’t exist (no downloads via Whispernet, no “Folks who bought this also bought”, no Amazon at all. In the world of online marketing, Amazon are in the Pantheon, and it is not because of the things they say about themselves and the products they sell, it’s all a part of the mechanics of how they sell.

So here’s how I get the most out of my Kindle. First, I don’t use it all the time. Rather than purchasing some aerosol canister of book scent to spray and give me that whiff of physical authenticity, I still get books from my local library (I get lots, in fact). I have several interesting newer titles that I’ve purchased from Amazon which are always available and loaded on my Kindle. These I also access from the Kindle App in my iPhone (because nothing kills me more than having to wait an hour at a Doctor or Dentist office or waiting while I get my car serviced and not having anything interesting to read. I can tap right into my Kindle books from the device or my iPhone. I really like that.

Then, I load my Kindle up with tons of stuff from Project Gutenberg. I like to read to my kids, and so I have tons of classic Children’s books loaded on the device. Andersen’s Fairy Tales, Grimm’s, Lewis Carroll, Edith Nesbitt (who is a real find), L. Frank Baum and J.M. Barrie. I have loads of books — everything from Thucydides to Poul Anderson. In all honesty, nothing says “Happy Geek” like reading Frederich Schiller’s (complete) History of the Thirty Years War as a free eText on your eBook reader. In fact, all these titles are available from Gutenberg as mobi formatted downloads (mobi is a DRM free format that is a precursor to Amazon’s .azw format and fully supported on the Kindle. The only mild inconvenience is that I have to download the content to my computer and then plug the Kindle in via USB to copy the new content. But, with a nice SD card, the Kindle can accomadate a ton of books, and I load a GB of free mobi books on mine just to ensure I never run out of good reading. I still have ample room for Amazon purchases.

I have no regrets about buying a Kindle: I am still a proud card-carrying Library patron, and I’m pleased to now say that I think Project Gutenberg is not just a good idea (which it has always been), but a great place to get reading material. I hate reading off computer screens any more than I have to, and the Kindle is a great electronic approximation of the printed page.

Now all we need to figure out is how we can get authors to autograph our electronic books.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags: , , , ,

In the Small is Michael Hague’s first foray into the wold of Graphic Novels. Michael has been a successful illustrator for nearly thirty years and is one of the few (if not the only) illustrators I know of who has illustrated J.R.R. Tolkien without making a career out of Tolkien. (In fact almost all other available illustrated editions of Tolkien currently available are from Alan Lee and John Howe).

In The Small is an apocalyptic tale of survival in which a young man’s sensitivity to premonitions give rise to his leadership in the post apocalypse. The story is very compelling despite its being one of many post-apocalyptic tales. Also, the details of how the apocalypse comes in the book are quite new and interesting. But what really made this book so enjoyable for me was Michael’s unparalleled talent as an illustrator.

There is indeed something refreshing in seeing a “traditional” illustrator make the transition to a more modern form like Graphic Novels and do it so well. I ran into Michael and his son Devon (neither of whom do I know particularly well, but who I have met a few times) about 2 years ago in a bookshop, and they both mentioned that they were interested in graphic novels and starting to work on one. I am disappointed to say that my first thought was, “why?” (More a commentary on my past snobbery towards Graphic Novels than my opinion of Mr. Hague.) Well, Michael, I am now pleased to say, I feel foolish for even thinking it. I’ll be one of the first to purchase the second installment and I’ll openly encourage others to check out In the Small.

Incidentally, I’m proud to say that I’m developing a more favorable attitude toward Graphic Novels these days, and have even been known to enjoy some Manga. Perhaps, there is hope for me yet.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

For the last week, we (the family) have been in New Mexico for a restful and inspiring vacation. I have a great deal that I’d like to write about, particularly to publicize certain places we’ve visited. It is highly unlikely that I’ll be able to mention even a fraction of the placed we’ve been.

I would like to say that we stayed at one of the most amazing places: Rancho Jacona which is a 34 acre ranch with guest houses for rent located about 15 miles north of Santa Fe in the Pojoaque Valley. The houses are amazing! We stayed in Casa de Conejo (Rabbit House) which is a spacious three bedroom, two bath adobe. The whole place is super kid and pet friendly. There is an enclosed rabbit warren, sheep, goats, miniature donkeys, chickens, and a cadre of peacocks and peahens who wander about and frequently rest on the roofs of the houses. Some of the houses on the property are (according to the owner) just over 300 years old — the property being the former residence of the Roybal Family who were given a grant from the King of Spain to a huge area of land north of Santa Fe which now makes up the tribal lands of the Tesuque, Nambe and other settlements of Tewa Indians. Just a couple miles down the road toward Los Alamos is the Pueblo San Ildefonso and north of that about 4 miles toward Española is Pueblo Santa Clara. Rancho Jacona is sufficiently remote to be ultra quiet and relaxing, but is only a twenty minute drive into downtown Santa Fe, less than that to half a dozen spectacular Pueblos and other sites. It is an insignificant drive to the wonders of Abiquiú and Bandolier National Monument.

The entire area is the most beautiful landscape: hills peppered with juniper and cholla, sandy arroyos lined with towering cottonwoods and in late March the entire setting has a backdrop of sandy barrancas (cliffs) and snow-capped peaks.

A few other places that must be visited by anyone in Santa Fe: Museum Hill (specifically the Spanish Colonial Arts Museum which is a recent addition, but spectacular. It houses an impressive collection of Santos of all types (Bultos, Retablos) as well as items of silver, tin and traditional woodcarving. The Museum is in a spectacular 5,000 square foot adobe designed in 1930 by famed New Mexico architect John Gaw Meem.

The Santa Fe Children’s Museum: Let’s just say we took our kids there hopeful that it would keep them happy for an hour and three and a half hours later, we had to literally drag them out. Loads of fun for any child ages 3 to 13.

Finally, I should say that for new books, the place in Santa Fe is the Collected Works Bookstore. The demise of the small, independent bookstore is a tragedy of epic measure and every once in a while one comes cross a small store that resists the abuses of chain bookselling. Collected Works, like Fact and Fiction in Missoula, Montana is one such rare find.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Tags: ,

So, I had the distinct pleasure of visiting Snowden’s Books in Santa Fe this afternoon. A wonderful little independent bookstore run by Jim Snowden.

I managed to get out without taking a second mortgage, but I found some wonderful books, most about the history and culture of Santa Fe. I did find a beautiful copy of Roald Dahl’s collection of stories Ah, Sweet Mystery of Life, which I remeber being the collection about his poaching days which led to the book Danny Champion of the World (in fact one of the stories in the collection is called “Champion of the World.”

Dahl, like Graham Greene, is a a person to study, particularly for thier short stories. I’ve never read a Dahl short story that didn’t interest, and some are masterful examples of the craft. I look forward to reading these over the next few nights here in New Mexico.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

Interestingly enough, this is turning into a reading log more than a topical blog. Oh, well. I can’t say I’m in the least disappointed. When the seemingly endless days of February and March teaching are working against me, all I really want to do is spend my spare time reading.

I did read Dreamsbane of Tamalor last weekend, and I enjoyed it. I do find most of this type of fantasy to be derivative of Tolkien and, in the case of this little book, Dungeons and Dragons. But still, it was fun and interesting.

I’ve started reading Introducing Character Animation with Blender as I am currently teaching a course in 3D graphics to a group of High School students. Blender is very much my preferred tool for the course as it is open source, and supported by a massive, supportive community of artists, developers, educators and enthusiasts. I am delighted to see the growth in this project from its early days. I was first introduced to Blender back in 2002, and its growth has been spectacular. I’ll hopefully add more Blender content here as time passes.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • TwitThis

« Older entries